This manual, the infamous KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation, dated July , is the source of much of the material in the second manual. KUBARK. Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK interrogation, and particularly the counterintelligence interrogation of resistant sources. This page report, classified Secret, was drafted in July as a comprehensive guide for training interrogators in the art of obtaining.
|Published (Last):||14 May 2012|
|PDF File Size:||3.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For example, the [approx. A session with the witness may be recorded. He is not able to withstand very counterintellignce pressure; he reacts to a challenge not by increasing his efforts but rather by running away to avoid conflict.
Questioning suspects immediately, on a flimsy factual basis, will usually cause waste of time, not save it. Since KUBARK employees cannot be witnesses in court, each investigation must be conducted in such a manner that evidence obtained may be properly introduced if the case comes to trial.
Democracy, Intervention, and Human Rights. It is very helpful if the screener can imaginatively place himself in the subject’s position. After this investigation, the Department of Defense discontinued the use of the manuals, directed their recovery to the extent practicable, and destroyed the copies in the field.
It is also essential that the interrogatee know or suspect that the witness may be in possession of the incriminating information. If they are interrogated, the reason interrogatiom that they are known or believed to fall into one of the following categories.
It is better to leave an avenue of escape, a loophole which permits the source to correct his story without looking foolish.
If the witness denounces the interrogatee there is no problem. From the beginning of planning to the end of questioning it has been necessary to understand and guard against the various troubles that a vengeful ex-source can cause. He is frequently a daredevil who compensates for his anxiety by pretending that there is no such thing as danger.
Sure there are a couple sections where it’s describing personality types in the context of interrogation. And even the provocateur who substitutes a fictitious person for his real father will disclose some of his feelings about his father in the course of detailing his story about the imaginary substitute.
I won’t go into detail of my personal opinions here, but suffice it to mention that as a participant in a US SERE program, the threshold between torture and interrogation blurs across several of the specific techniques articulated in this document. Like the guilt-ridden character, the schizoid character may be an unreliable subject for testing by LCFLUTTER because his internal needs lead him to confuse fact with fancy. Within a short time most people who have begun talking about themselves go back to early experiences, so that merely by listening and occasionally making a quiet, encouraging remark the screener can learn a great deal.
Lists with This Book. It is also a good expedient to have the interrogatee make notes of topics that should be covered, which occur to him while discussing the immediate matters at issue.
It used electrical currents to inflict pain [source: Sleep deprivation should never be underestimated. So are persons who have been arrested several times. If operational use is contemplated, recruitment may sometimes be effected through such queries as, “I wonder if you would be willing to undertake a dangerous mission. This principle also affects the decision to employ coercive techniques and governs the choice of these methods.
TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » CIA, KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Manual
The desire for approval provides the interrogator with a handle. The self-esteem of the interrogatee and of the interrogator becomes involved, and the interrogatee fights to keep his secrets from his opponent for subjective reasons, because he is grimly determined not to be the loser, the inferior.
It is not easy to distinguish between innocent blocks — things held back for reasons of personal prestige — and guilty blocks — things the interrogator needs to know. Although this person is fearful, he is engaged in a constant struggle to conceal his fears.
Has a quit-claim been obtained? In this small world of two inhabitants a clash of personalities — as distinct from a conflict of purposes — assumes exaggerated force, like a tornado in a wind-tunnel. The effect of someone wandering in because he forgot his pen or wants to invite the interrogator to lunch can be devastating.
If statements rest on assumptions, the facts upon which the conclusions are based are necessary to evaluation. There has been a good deal of discussion of interrogation experts vs.
It is sound practice to write up each interrogation report on the day of questioning or, at least, before the next session, so that defects can be promptly remedied and gaps or contradictions noted in time. You should never hazard the important question until you have laid the foundation for it in such a way that, when confronted with the fact, the witness can neither deny nor explain it.
CIA, KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Manual
All analyses of the defector-refugee flow have shown that the Orbit services are well-aware of the advantages offered by this channel as a means of planting their agents in target countries.
The second is that even if they prove accurate for large groups, the data are like those in actuarial tables; they have no specific predictive value for individuals. And for interrogation interroggation the ways in which he differs from the abstract type may be more significant than the ways in which he conforms.
There is indeed a torture manual and the CIA literally wrote it. Masochists also belong in this category. If two or more interrogation sources are suspected of joint complicity in acts knterrogation against U. Antonio rated it really liked it Sep 16, Because he is not always capable of distinguishing between fact and fantasy, he may be unaware of lying.
The choice of methods depends in part upon the answer to this question. The interrogator begins routine questioning of A, speaking rather softly and inducing A to follow suit. Why a Draft Would Weaken the U.